BellSouth forgets who their customers are


With the dot-bomb bust of internet providers in 1999, there are only a few high speed options left out there. And now some of those internet providers are looking to protect their interests. BellSouth would like to be able to charge internet sites for the priviledge of reaching BellSouth customers. Does this sound like a service you'd want to pay for?

William L. Smith, chief technology officer for Atlanta-based BellSouth Corp., told reporters and analysts that an Internet service provider such as his firm should be able, for example, to charge Yahoo Inc. for the opportunity to have its search site load faster than that of Google Inc.

Or, Smith said, his company should be allowed to charge a rival voice-over-Internet firm so that its service can operate with the same quality as BellSouth's offering.

Network operators can identify the digital "packets" of content moving through their wires from sites and services and can block some or put others at the head of the stream.

But Smith was quick to say that Internet service providers should not be able to block or discriminate against Web content or services by degrading their performance.

Riight. BellSouth would never disrupt Vonage packets to protect their telephone business. At least that is what they are saying this week. And isn't promoting! Yahoo! packets! over Google packets a way of discriminating against Google by degrading their performance?

I'm not expert, but as I understand the internet BellSouth cannot promote some packets without demoting others. Since the packets all travel at the same speed over any given internet hop, the limitation has more to do with how wide the pipe is. In other words, the limitation is the quantity of packets that are permitted to flow across a wire at any given time. And when you're bandwidth is limited by the size of the pipe, allowing more Yahoo! packets to flow would mean you have to slow down everyone else. So if you're searching Google and your neighbor is searching Yahoo!, he gets his results back quicker.

"Prioritization is just another word for degrading your competitor," said Gigi B. Sohn, president of Public Knowledge, a digital rights advocacy group. "If we want to ruin the Internet, we'll turn it into a cable TV system" that carries programming from only those who pay the cable operators for transmission.
Amen to that.



Comments (5)      top   link me

Comments

I think you misunderstood the intention. Searching, or for that matter, any trivial web browsing is not going to feel the pinch. Do you realize that even now when you browse websites, you get different throughputs from them depending on a multitude of factors like geographical location, data pipes etc. The proposal is mainly talking about delay-sensitive applications like gaming and interactive entertainment at video speeds!

Posted by: Saurabh Garg at December 2, 2005 1:45 AM

I understood the intention completely. Do you realize that BellSouth has no control over factors like geographical location, and the different throughputs of internet nodes. They control the pipe from the local backbone to your house and that's it. They control maybe one to three or four hops max.

Once packets reache BellSouth, they should be delivered mostly FIFO. Some of it may be asynchronous, but for the most part the packets will be relayed in the order received.

Prioritizing some packets means others are being slowed down.

Posted by: Ravenwood at December 2, 2005 7:22 AM

Actually it is quite easy to give various packets different treatment based on what is in the packet. The big telecommunications company I work for makes a layer 4-7 family of products that can do just what Bell South is stating. Usually Businesses use the product to prioritize important services (such as VoIP) and ensure that the servers are load balanced.

It is quite easy to dive very deeply into the packet stream and put Google packets into the bit bucket if you wanted.

Posted by: Kirk at December 3, 2005 11:19 AM

Kirk,

Thanks for weighing in. I have no doubt about the technology behind it. I'm just saying that there are no free lunches. By increasing the priority of Google packets, you are displacing others.

Posted by: Ravenwood at December 3, 2005 12:21 PM

Bellsouth has lost it all becuase of the bumbling incompetent fools in charge

Posted by: sandpiper at December 5, 2005 4:04 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer