A woman is being stabbed to death by her ex-husband in the middle of a Wal-Mart store. A passerby - who routinely carries a gun for self defense - intervenes on her behalf and sends the ex-husband to meet his maker. The police say it's justified and a district attorney is reviewing the case but will not likely file charges. But the gun fearing wussies and anti-self-defense crowd is going nuts.

Kevin Baker points out that the moonbats are actually saying this guy had no right to intervene. He should have ignored the stabbing and minded his own business. Here's a sampling from the various wingnuts:

The shooting may have been justified but not killing the man because under the law, the penalty for stabbing your ex-wife is not death...

Absolutely no one here knows squat as to whether an innocent life was saved or not. Turns out, an innocent life was not saved (as defined under the law). Whether threatening with a knife (not a capital offense) or with a cannon...

This law stinks to start with, but what moron shoots to kill when a shot into the ceiling, or failing that, a shot to the foot would have likely stopped this situation...

This is what I like to call the short skirt syndrome. They have sypmathy for the rapist and blame the victim for wearing a short skirt. I'd have more respect for them if they didn't mince words and came right out and said "The bitch had it coming". That way we'd at least know where they're coming from.