More feel good legislation


The Oregon Governor signed a bill to "curb meth production" reports the Medford News. What he's actually done is turn a $5 box of cold medicine into a $90 visit to your family doctor to get a prescription.

"Meth has robbed many Oregon children of the right to grow up in a happy and healthy home," said Governor Kulongoski. "Limiting the availability of pseudoephedrine and providing long-term treatment will give hope for these kids to get their families back."

Measures that the Governor signed today will require that pseudoephedrine be available only by prescription and will provide additional resources for treatment and enforcement.

So Oregon children have the right to be happy and healthy, just so long as nobody gets a cold. I'm not one to support meth addicts, but taking away legitimate products because of the actions of a few is asinine. What's more, this will do almost nothing to curb meth availability or addiction. Prohibition never works and serves only to create an underground market and finance organized crime. The artificial increase in the price of sudafed will only mean that the drug will join the litany of products being bootlegged across state and international borders.


Category:  Pleasure Police
Comments (5)      top   link me

Comments

The FDA has a history too of banning anything that works for canine incontinence, first DES and then phenylpropanolomine (PPA, ingredient in diet pills abused by teenaged girls). What used be a penny a pill is now a dollar a pill, thanks to them.

As far as I know, there's no underground in canine incontinence pills.

Posted by: Ron Hardin at August 18, 2005 7:08 AM

I'm going to have to take issue with you on this one. Before moving to Texas, I lived in Portland for 15 years, and meth was a problem the magnitude of which is difficult for someone outside of the state to comprehend. The problem is even worse now.

Oregon has tried many different methods to control the spread of meth, and it appears the time has finally come to go to the source. I agree that requiring a prescription for cold medicine may seem extreme- and it is. If you lived in Oregon, you might have a better understanding for what a horrendous problem meth has become. Oregon is a state with limited resources. What else might you suggest they do?

Posted by: Jack Cluth at August 18, 2005 8:42 AM

Jack,

Making otc cold medication a controlled substance is not going to have much impact on meth production. It may drive the price up a bit, but it's much more likely to increase crime. You'll have people bootlegging it over state lines, ordering it online, or simply robbing or burgling pharmacies to get it.

There is no simple solution to the drug problem. But I suspect that one reason drug users tend to flock to Oregon is because the state caters to the granola crowd, and they are soft on drug crime. Try locking some of these people up for a long time, and not letting them out on parole.

Or take the libertarian approach, and legalize it. But that's another discussion...

Posted by: Ravenwood at August 18, 2005 9:01 AM

Apparently Jack believes that meth addicts can't drive accross the river to Vancouver.

Posted by: Kristopher Barrett at August 18, 2005 3:05 PM

When I worked at Wal Mart our state passed a bill that required the pharmacist to give out the drug to customers who asked. This was at first dumb in my book since anyone could go from one place to another but the criminal mind in general isn't as smart as it used to be and it actually has reduced meth in our state somewhat. (Must be the same people who shoplift, why the hell do you go to the same store and do it over and over, you'll get caught!) Anyway, these people are easy to spot since they ask stuff like "What is the limit, give it to me." Show up more than three times in a day buying the same thing, and buying everything with a trackable monetary form.


I think the under the counter bill is a better compromise over making people get a prescription for it. The Drug Tech can keep an eye out for any repeat offfenders and the state doesn't have to butt in or cost us a in money or a great loss of freedom.

Posted by: Rhett at August 18, 2005 4:24 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer