Ravenwood - 06/29/05 06:15 AM
"The Supreme Court vacated that section of Amendment Five today, in their ruling that the government has the power to seize anyone's property for any reason, as long as they can trump up some bullshit "public benefit" line of reasoning. I think David Souter's home should be first on the list to be seized." -- Ravenwood, June 23, 2005.
"Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land." -- Freestar Media, June 27, 2005.
Category: Schadenfreude
Comments (1) top link me
I cannot even describe how happy this would make me to see a Holiday Inn on the Property Formerly known as David Souter's.
Seriously, these clowns should feel fortunate if theft of private property is all that happens to them. The more they increase their self-appointed power, the greater the risk that one or more get whacked in the relatively near future.
Posted by: roger at June 29, 2005 8:35 AM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1.99K - 2K7
