Rules for thee but not for me


iconLast week's shooting of a judge in Atlanta is fueling the fight to allow judges and court officials to legally carry firearms. In Illinois of all places, lawmakers have drafted a bill that will let judges legally protect themselves with a firearm.

Sen. Larry Bomke (R-Springfield) said he decided to draft the bill after getting a call from Sangamon County Circuit Judge Patrick Kelley, a former prosecutor, who said judges are concerned about retribution from people who appear before them.
Now I usually cheer anytime someone chips away at draconian gun bans. But isn't this interesting? Whenever gun violence happens in the 'hood, gun grabbers usually scream for more gun control. But when the threat of gun violence takes aim at public officials, they suddenly become Second Amendment purists who push for the right to arm themselves for self defense.

As for the rest of Illinois, let them eat cake.



Comments (1)      top   link me

Comments

It's more of do as I say not as I do.

Posted by: kjo at March 14, 2005 4:20 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer