Ravenwood - 02/14/05 06:45 AM
This time from the Washington Times. What's in a name?
Gun lobbyists to sue over ban at CapitolI'm tired of being labeled as a lobbyist just because I support gun rights and the Second Amendment. Especially since I would also fashion myself as a gun safety advocate. As someone who handles guns quite a bit, gun safety is pretty darned important. What the Times really means, is Gun Grabbers support the ban; anti-freedom advocates support the ban; gun control lobbyists support the ban.Gun safety advocates. . .support the ban.
Category: Blaming the Media
Comments (5) top link me
after yesterday's shooting in a NY mall, I kept hearing on the news "if we would just ban all access to guns, this wouldn't have happened" - I wanted to throw up. How about this? If we medicated all the anti-gun people, the rest of us could drop our blood pressure meds.
Posted by: Da Goddess at February 14, 2005 8:12 AMInteresting, considering guns are already banned in New York.
Posted by: Ravenwood at February 14, 2005 8:50 AMIf there were no guns, the guy would have used an axe. And he'd probably have killed several people with an axe. (Last I heard, the whole toll was 1 wounded - after apparently firing off a whole magazine in semi-auto in a crowded mall.)
Posted by: markm at February 14, 2005 12:08 PM"Gun lobbyists to sue over ban at Capitol"
Try "Civil rights activists sue over ban at Capitol"
Posted by: Billll at February 14, 2005 9:08 PMNotice how gun rights people are "lobbyists", and gun-grabbers are "safety advocates". They never call us "gun rights advocates".
Posted by: Robert Garrard at February 18, 2005 7:15 PM(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014
