Restaurant smoking bans give off the foul odor of intolerance


iconSteve Chapman of the Chicago Tribune notes that in some communities, enough is never enough.

Tobacco opponents once had to endure the risk of being enveloped in fumes anytime they went out to eat. But as the number of smokers has declined, restaurants have adapted to satisfy nonsmokers. They forbid cigars and pipes, offer separate smokers and nonsmokers sections, or simply prohibit smoking altogether.

Wilmette has 39 restaurants, and before the ordinance was passed, 33 of them didn't allow smoking. Anyone with an aversion to the smell of tobacco had plenty of dining options even without crossing village boundaries. Chicago, for that matter, has some 500 smoke-free restaurants.

But getting their way 85 percent of the time was not enough for the proponents of total bans.

Anti-smoking rules are about controlling behavior, not about meeting a non-smoking demand.



Comments (2)      top   link me

Comments

85% would thrill me.

hln

Posted by: hln at November 24, 2003 10:01 PM

Its an equal opportunity bigotry.

Posted by: Brett at November 25, 2003 10:15 AM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1.99K - 2K7

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif




archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer