Oregon bans minors from stripping in bars


So reports the AP. The 'minors' they are talking about are those girls that are 18, but not yet 21. They will no longer be allowed to earn a living in establishments that also serve alcoholic beverages.

Personally, I don't see what one has to do with the other. In most establishments, dancers are not even employees, they are independent contractors. What should it matter if the place they contract to serves beer to their patrons or not? Are blue laws coming back?



Comments (2)      top   link me

Comments

Like all 21 age laws, this is a stupid an inconsistant restriction. I'm not a fan of 18 year olds becoming strippers, mind you, but honestly -- are these girls supposed to magically mature a great deal in three years? And if they aren't mature enough to even be around alcohol, why are they allowed to vote? Geez...

Posted by: Owen Courrèges at January 11, 2003 1:19 AM

And who wants an old over the hill 21 year old stripper?

Posted by: Ravenwood at January 11, 2003 12:41 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer