Gore Calls 2000 Verdict 'Crushing,' Assails Court


No, this isn't something from the wayback machine. Algore is still speaking about the 2000 election, and apparently he is still bitter.

"I believe that if everyone in Florida who tried to vote had had his or her vote counted properly, that I would have won," says Algore in an interview with Washington Post Magazine. "I strongly disagreed with the Supreme Court decision and the way in which they interpreted and applied the law. But I respect the rule of law, so it is what it is."

Algore figures if you repeat something enough times, it becomes the truth. The fact of the matter is that the SCOTUS simply said that Florida must apply the law equally to all counties. They are not permitted to single out heavily democratic areas and apply different standards to divine more votes. Since the decision didn't go their way, lefties have repeatedly called for the resignation, and impeachment of some of the Justices. To back up their claims they repeatedly utter half truths and falsehoods.

The Washington Post does their part by calling it a "5-4 Supreme Court decision that put Bush in the White House." For the record, the SCOTUS decision was 7-2 in agreement that Florida's recount process violated Constitutional equal protection and due process guarantees. The 5-4 decision simply set the deadline for recounts at midnight of that day, effectively terminating the process.



Comments (1)      top   link me

Comments

The point of agreement of the seven justices would have placed Bush in the White House. The only disagreement was over the remedy -- whether to stop the recounts now or wait until the certification deadline. It was pretty darn clear the Florida Supremes had overstepped their bounds in overriding election law, which became a Constitutional issue since the state legislatures alone are given the constitutional responsibility of setting election law.

In any case, it was a close enough election to where there were going to be whiners either way. The recent midterm elections, however, should remove the myth of the absent mandate.

Posted by: Owen Courrèges at November 15, 2002 1:19 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer