Congressmen: No more probes of congressmen


Over the normal course of a criminal investigation, it is sometimes prudent to serve a search warrant in order to peek around someone's house for hard evidence to support said investigation. There are legal safeguards in place to protect Constitutional rights, and these are rules that average Americans have lived under for generations.

But in a classic case of "rules for thee but not for me", Congress is letting investigators know that they are not average Americans. Serving a warrant on one of the Congressional elite, no matter how much evidence there is backing it up, is a no-no. How dare you treat grand exalted Congressmen as mere citizens. At least that seems to be the thinking up on the hill.

When the feds raided the apartment of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) and uncovered $90,000 in bribe money stashed in his freezer, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle cried foul. Speaker Hastert went so far as to call the seizing of bribe money unConstitutional.

House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) expressed alarm at the raid. "The actions of the Justice Department in seeking and executing this warrant raise important Constitutional issues that go well beyond the specifics of this case," he said in a lengthy statement released last night.

"Insofar as I am aware, since the founding of our Republic 219 years ago, the Justice Department has never found it necessary to do what it did Saturday night, crossing this Separation of Powers line, in order to successfully prosecute corruption by Members of Congress," he said. "Nothing I have learned in the last 48 hours leads me to believe that there was any necessity to change the precedent established over those 219 years."

I think it's high time that Congressmen be subjected to the laws they force on the rest of us. Let Ted Kennedy be given extra scrutiny in the airport. Make Jim McDermott obey eavesdropping laws.

Those who make the laws should be expected to follow them just as we are expected to.

Both Democrats and Republicans "said the tactic was unduly aggressive and may have breached the constitutional separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government."

When I was in school, I was taught that we had a system of checks and balances. That Congress made the laws, while the Executive enforced the laws. I guess they don't teach that in private school.


Category:  Left-wing Conspiracy
Comments (4)      top   link me

Comments

These days, it seems to be all checks and no balance.

Posted by: BobG at May 23, 2006 11:20 AM

England has (or had) some very ancient traditions giving members of parliament immunity from arrest while on their way to or at a session of parliament. These came about to prevent political arrests in an attempt to influence votes in parliament, and I think that to some extent they were carried over into American law. It was considered better to delay justice a few months until the session was over than to give the party in power the possibility of rounding up all the dissidents in Congress.

However, that tradition made a lot more sense when Congress only met for a few months a year and the American court system was un-tested. Now, they're in session almost all the time, and anyone with a million dollars for lawyers can get a more than fair trial... Letting a crook continue his, errr, "work" in Congress for most of a year seems rather excessive. Furthermore, there's a difference between arresting someone and just searching their apartment.

Posted by: markm at May 23, 2006 12:22 PM

Church is not safe, a residential home is not safe, a private business is not safe. So why is a congressional office safe? It is bullshit and they were called on it.

Good job on the Search Warrant! I hope they fight it up to the S.C. and create a full-fledged presidence for it. But I don't think they'll be that stupid.

Posted by: Rhett at May 25, 2006 3:54 PM

This is outragous, people are still people and no one person has more rights then another. Breaking the law, no matter how small or big the case is, is nonetheless breaking the law and ALL persons involved deserve proper persecution. Although the law will never be perfect for it is made through the eyes of human nature.

Posted by: Ryan at May 30, 2006 8:49 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer