Police: Protecting women is a man's job


iconJackson (TN) Police Chief Rick Staples says that women are too stupid to learn to use guns. Instead of trying to protect themselves, they should travel in groups or rely on rape whistles to scare bad guys away. Oh he doesn't say that explicitly. Instead he portrays guns as complex technical devices that women are just too simple minded to learn how to use. He claims that protecting women is a (police) man's job.

"There are many ways for people to learn how to defend themselves, and you don't want to see anyone live in fear," he said. "We all have a right to protect ourselves ... but our jails are full of women who've killed a spouse, and they were unable to prove it was self-defense."
I had thought the burden of proof was on the prosecution. If I were on the jury, a history of domestic violence would be more than enough reasonable doubt.
Staples said that "deadly force, in any situation, should always be the absolute last resort."

To women who are living in an abusive relationship, or a relationship where they constantly fear the potential for abuse, Staples offers this advice: "The first thing they should do is flee ... separate from the other party, and use those instruments the justice system (orders of protection and restraining orders) and support organizations that have been set up ... use those organizations, such as WRAP, that are there to help you, advise you and shelter you. There's no shame in seeking that kind of help."

Ahh, paper protection. The cemetaries are full of women who had restraining orders "protecting" them from an abusive spouse. I hate to sound callous, but men who beat women are a pet peeve of mine. Any cowardly man who beats up a woman deserves to be shot.
[Madison County Sheriff David Woolfork] said it's the same as walking by yourself in public.

"You exercise good judgment," he said. "If the potential for violence is there, even if it's a minor encounter, make sure you report it to law enforcement and let them handle the matter."

Huh? I thought they only arrested people for actual or attempted crimes, not "potential" ones.
That said, "if a person has a history of being victimized by an abusive spouse or significant other, and who's taken the steps of separating themselves from that relationship, yet still lives in fear based on direct or indirect threats, then I can see how they would want to learn how to defend themselves."
So you should only arm yourself if your husband beats you repeatedly and then violates his restraining order.
The State Department of Safety requires an eight-hour course (four hours in the classroom, four hours on the firing range) to qualify for a handgun permit. But Woolfork said that, after that class, you can't put the training in the drawer with the gun and be able to draw it out at a moment's notice.

"All our officers have to go through training once a year - and our tactical officers train monthly," he said.

Staples adds, "you must also know and understand your equipment and treat it with respect. A high percentage of police officers have been killed (accidentally) by their own weapons, and these are individuals who are highly trained."

I don't want to tell the Chief of Police how to do his job, but if I had a high percentage of my officers kill themselves with their own firearms, I might consider having them train more than once a year.

Of course the problem with this kind of attitude is that it gets women killed. The police are only able to prevent crime about 5% of the time. The rest of the time they are investigating after the fact. This article by the Independent Women's Forum should be required reading off all women.


Category:  Defending Your Life
Comments (5)      top   link me

Comments

"...A high percentage of police officers have been killed (accidentally) by their own weapons, and these are individuals who are highly trained."

While rushing to the aid of women in distress no doubt.

Posted by: Steve Scudder at April 13, 2005 9:42 AM

My hopefully future department requires all officers to re-quallify 4 times a year. And they are very profficient with their weapons.


More to the point, this department is not afraid of citizens bearing arms.

Posted by: Rhett at April 13, 2005 6:33 PM

Rank and file cops almost never support gun control. They walk their beat and know that criminals don't obey gun laws.

Most of the time you see a cop supporting gun control, it's the top brass.

Posted by: Ravenwood at April 13, 2005 7:03 PM

Sounds like his agency handles the same kind of officers I see at the range. They show up just before qualifications, shoot a box or so, manage to do just well enough to qualify, and don't fire another shot 'till next time.

Oh, yeah, wonderfully trained.

Posted by: Mark at April 14, 2005 3:35 AM

"Sounds like his agency handles the same kind of officers I see at the range. They show up just before qualifications, shoot a box or so, manage to do just well enough to qualify, and don't fire another shot 'till next time."

And they probably spend more time at the local Donut Shop than at the range...

Posted by: Robert Garrard at April 15, 2005 6:38 PM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1990 - 2014

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif

Bitch Girls
Bogie Blog
Countertop Chronicles
DC Thornton
Dean's World
Dumb Criminals
Dustbury
Gallery Clastic
Geek with a .45
Gut Rumbles
Hokie Pundit
Joanie
Lone Star Times
Other Side of Kim
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Scrappleface
Silflay Hraka
Smallest Minority
The Command Post
Venomous Kate
VRWC


FemmeBloggers


archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus
Hosted by: Bluehost

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer