'Richest' have had a 'free ride'


"We need to be raising tax revenues back from where we cut them before. We cut taxes for the richest. It's time to get those back. They had a free ride for a while, but that is the first tax we have to get back." -- Art Pulaski, head of the California Labor Federation, on why taxes should be raised for the 'rich'.

Free ride? I suppose the 'richest' have not been paying taxes for the past couple of years, while the poor people shouldered all of the load.



Comments (1)      top   link me

Comments

And what is the definition of rich? Some think it's making of 35k a year for a household - in that case I'm "rich".

Posted by: Bogie at January 8, 2003 7:08 AM

(c) Ravenwood and Associates, 1.99K - 2K7

About Ravenwood
Libertarianism
Libertarian Quiz
Secrets o' the Universe
Email Ravenwood

reading
<Blogroll Me>
/images/buttons/ru-button-r.gif




archives

search the universe



rings etc

Gun Blogs


rss feeds
[All Versions]
[PDA Version]
[Non-CSS Version]
XML 0.91
RSS 1.0 (blurb)
RSS 2.0 (full feed)
 

credits
Design by:

Powered by: Movable Type 3.34
Encryption by: Deltus

Ravenwood's Universe:
Established 1990

Odometer

OdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometerOdometer